<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixing a scanner broken by the Feisty upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html</link>
	<description>Ubuntu Linux Tutorials,Howtos,Tips &#38; News &#124; Oneiric,Natty,Maverick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:40:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: about to go</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-5061</link>
		<dc:creator>about to go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-5061</guid>
		<description>After 3 years using Ubuntu as default operating system I&#039;m seriously considering going back to Windows, with scanners being top of the list as reason to go.

After every single upgrade (2 x per year) I had to spend a couple of days troubleshooting issues to get scanners working.

Now again on 8.10 my BenQ/Acer 640BT. Most of the help on the net also make huge assumptions that everyone on the planet knows about where to get the &quot;firmware&quot; files for a particular scanner, knows everything about non-obvious security (being a member of groups such a &quot;scanner&quot; doesn&#039;t give you the permission to use the scanner), references to directories that doesn&#039;t exist, kernel settings for which there no way for the layman to check ... and the list go on .....

Maybe I can get diploma or degree in getting scanners to work on Ubuntu .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 3 years using Ubuntu as default operating system I&#8217;m seriously considering going back to Windows, with scanners being top of the list as reason to go.</p>
<p>After every single upgrade (2 x per year) I had to spend a couple of days troubleshooting issues to get scanners working.</p>
<p>Now again on 8.10 my BenQ/Acer 640BT. Most of the help on the net also make huge assumptions that everyone on the planet knows about where to get the &#8220;firmware&#8221; files for a particular scanner, knows everything about non-obvious security (being a member of groups such a &#8220;scanner&#8221; doesn&#8217;t give you the permission to use the scanner), references to directories that doesn&#8217;t exist, kernel settings for which there no way for the layman to check &#8230; and the list go on &#8230;..</p>
<p>Maybe I can get diploma or degree in getting scanners to work on Ubuntu &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrés</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrés</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>I have UBUNTU 8.10 - Scanner Canon Lide 25
I did al the way:

root@personal-laptop:~# scanimage -L
device `plustek:libusb:005:012&#039; is a Canon CanoScan LiDE25 flatbed scanner

root@personal-laptop:~# scanimage -T -d plustek:libusb:005:012
scanimage: scanning image of size 202x150 pixels at 24 bits/pixel
scanimage: acquiring RGB frame, 8 bits/sample
scanimage: reading one scanline, 606 bytes...	FAIL Error: Operation was cancelled

what is this error ??

When I used XSANE - i have the mesagge:  failed creating archive, no permission  (falló al crear el archivo, permiso denegado)

Any help ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have UBUNTU 8.10 - Scanner Canon Lide 25<br />
I did al the way:</p>
<p>root@personal-laptop:~# scanimage -L<br />
device `plustek:libusb:005:012&#8242; is a Canon CanoScan LiDE25 flatbed scanner</p>
<p>root@personal-laptop:~# scanimage -T -d plustek:libusb:005:012<br />
scanimage: scanning image of size 202&#215;150 pixels at 24 bits/pixel<br />
scanimage: acquiring RGB frame, 8 bits/sample<br />
scanimage: reading one scanline, 606 bytes&#8230;	FAIL Error: Operation was cancelled</p>
<p>what is this error ??</p>
<p>When I used XSANE - i have the mesagge:  failed creating archive, no permission  (falló al crear el archivo, permiso denegado)</p>
<p>Any help ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>I used all you said and started it with the plustek driver...it worked however it will not be found by xsane...using ubuntu 7.10  is a canon 670 /676 Lide 20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used all you said and started it with the plustek driver&#8230;it worked however it will not be found by xsane&#8230;using ubuntu 7.10  is a canon 670 /676 Lide 20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeSublett</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeSublett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>This is what i come up with

Bus 004 Device 004: ID 03f0:2305 Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3970c
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
Bus 001 Device 010: ID 03f0:0f07 Hewlett-Packard
Bus 001 Device 009: ID 0733:0401 ViewQuest Technologies, Inc. CS330 WebCam
Bus 001 Device 008: ID 058f:9254 Alcor Micro Corp. Hub
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000

dev/bus/usb/004/004 was change to a+w

wb0blv2@wb0blv2-desktop:~$ scanimage -L
device `v4l:/dev/video0&#039; is a Noname Intel Create and Share virtual device
device `hp3900:libusb:004:004&#039; is a Hewlett-Packard Scanjet 3970 flatbed scanner

wb0blv2@wb0blv2-desktop:~$ scanimage -T -d hp3900:libusb:004:004
scanimage: scanning image of size 1x1 pixels at 24 bits/pixel
scanimage: acquiring RGB frame, 8 bits/sample
scanimage: reading one scanline, 3 bytes...     PASS
scanimage: reading one byte...          FAIL Error: End of file</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what i come up with</p>
<p>Bus 004 Device 004: ID 03f0:2305 Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3970c<br />
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 0000:0000<br />
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000<br />
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000<br />
Bus 001 Device 010: ID 03f0:0f07 Hewlett-Packard<br />
Bus 001 Device 009: ID 0733:0401 ViewQuest Technologies, Inc. CS330 WebCam<br />
Bus 001 Device 008: ID 058f:9254 Alcor Micro Corp. Hub<br />
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000</p>
<p>dev/bus/usb/004/004 was change to a+w</p>
<p>wb0blv2@wb0blv2-desktop:~$ scanimage -L<br />
device `v4l:/dev/video0&#8242; is a Noname Intel Create and Share virtual device<br />
device `hp3900:libusb:004:004&#8242; is a Hewlett-Packard Scanjet 3970 flatbed scanner</p>
<p>wb0blv2@wb0blv2-desktop:~$ scanimage -T -d hp3900:libusb:004:004<br />
scanimage: scanning image of size 1&#215;1 pixels at 24 bits/pixel<br />
scanimage: acquiring RGB frame, 8 bits/sample<br />
scanimage: reading one scanline, 3 bytes&#8230;     PASS<br />
scanimage: reading one byte&#8230;          FAIL Error: End of file</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnCraick</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnCraick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt; Vote to get this fixed &lt;/strong&gt;

Ubuntu are running a &quot;brainstorm&quot; about what needs to be improved.

People whov&#039;e had this scanner problem might care to vote for the scanner fix.
See http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2657/

JohnC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Vote to get this fixed </strong></p>
<p>Ubuntu are running a &#8220;brainstorm&#8221; about what needs to be improved.</p>
<p>People whov&#8217;e had this scanner problem might care to vote for the scanner fix.<br />
See <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2657/" rel="nofollow">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2657/</a></p>
<p>JohnC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnCraick</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnCraick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>In reply to Mike above on 23 Feb 2008.

scanimage -T -d canon630u:libusb:003:003

- that&#039;s the wrong scanimage command. Perhaps my explanation wasn&#039;t clear enough.

Try scanimage -T -d plustek:libusb:003:003

Canon scanners (and several others) use the generic, plustek driver, not one of their own.
So scanimage -T -d canon630u:libusb etc won&#039;t work.

Good luck with it. I wonder if this will eventually be fixed by canonical in one of the new versions.

As a user, I don&#039;t know, and I don&#039;t care, who &quot;owns&quot; this problem but the fact that it has persisted for over a year and 2 Ubuntu versions is pretty bloody poor, IMO

Regards to all,

JohnC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Mike above on 23 Feb 2008.</p>
<p>scanimage -T -d canon630u:libusb:003:003</p>
<p>- that&#8217;s the wrong scanimage command. Perhaps my explanation wasn&#8217;t clear enough.</p>
<p>Try scanimage -T -d plustek:libusb:003:003</p>
<p>Canon scanners (and several others) use the generic, plustek driver, not one of their own.<br />
So scanimage -T -d canon630u:libusb etc won&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Good luck with it. I wonder if this will eventually be fixed by canonical in one of the new versions.</p>
<p>As a user, I don&#8217;t know, and I don&#8217;t care, who &#8220;owns&#8221; this problem but the fact that it has persisted for over a year and 2 Ubuntu versions is pretty bloody poor, IMO</p>
<p>Regards to all,</p>
<p>JohnC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>This step didn&#039;t work for me nothing happens.  Even when I remove the -d flag.  Now that my Windows XP disc is broken I guess I have to make a 5 GB Ubuntu Dapper 6.06 install just for my crappy CanonScan 630u.

&quot;scanimage -T -d canon630u:libusb:003:003&quot;

Soooo disappointing :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This step didn&#8217;t work for me nothing happens.  Even when I remove the -d flag.  Now that my Windows XP disc is broken I guess I have to make a 5 GB Ubuntu Dapper 6.06 install just for my crappy CanonScan 630u.</p>
<p>&#8220;scanimage -T -d canon630u:libusb:003:003&#8243;</p>
<p>Soooo disappointing <img src='http://www.ubuntugeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mad Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>mad Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>I have just entered scanbuttond into the session startup programs with the command &quot;scanbuttond -r 1000000&quot; . Restarted and my Canonlide30 was still working ok.

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just entered scanbuttond into the session startup programs with the command &#8220;scanbuttond -r 1000000&#8243; . Restarted and my Canonlide30 was still working ok.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psycho</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>Psycho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the help.
This worked perfect with a Cannon N1240U.
I enjoy Linux but am a beginner with many of the commands.
This was a great help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the help.<br />
This worked perfect with a Cannon N1240U.<br />
I enjoy Linux but am a beginner with many of the commands.<br />
This was a great help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>Everything worked till step 4 (with exclusion of the parameter &quot;-d&quot; in step 4), but after starting xsane I got again the error message and even step 3 is not working any more. Do you have some idea what is wrong?
I&#039;m using Scapscan 1212U.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything worked till step 4 (with exclusion of the parameter &#8220;-d&#8221; in step 4), but after starting xsane I got again the error message and even step 3 is not working any more. Do you have some idea what is wrong?<br />
I&#8217;m using Scapscan 1212U.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: András</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>András</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much, it worked me also, you helped me a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much, it worked me also, you helped me a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dompie</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>dompie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 09:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>Fantastisch (fantastic); het werkt (it works.
A shame (for Canonical) that this was not posted from the beginning.

Anyway: end good, all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastisch (fantastic); het werkt (it works.<br />
A shame (for Canonical) that this was not posted from the beginning.</p>
<p>Anyway: end good, all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osric</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Osric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot!!!
This is not a bug with Ubuntu, since I have had the same issue on Fedora 7. The scanner (Canon Lide 25) worked fine on an older version of Fedora. The workaround worked well. This probably a bug in the upgraded kernel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot!!!<br />
This is not a bug with Ubuntu, since I have had the same issue on Fedora 7. The scanner (Canon Lide 25) worked fine on an older version of Fedora. The workaround worked well. This probably a bug in the upgraded kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnaud</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>Woow! It works!
Thanks a lot guy !
If you pass in the belgium give a mail and I offer u a special beer !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woow! It works!<br />
Thanks a lot guy !<br />
If you pass in the belgium give a mail and I offer u a special beer !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Noseda, Melbourne, Aust</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Noseda, Melbourne, Aust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>Thankyou, thankyou. Scanner working perfectly again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou, thankyou. Scanner working perfectly again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Craick</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1743</link>
		<dc:creator>John Craick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1743</guid>
		<description>Scanning Problems Through a USB Hub

The following may help if you are still be having problems with scanner operation despite using scanbuttond.

My scanner would work about 1 time in 10, apparently depending on which USB device port it was allocated when it was plugged in. I normally connect it through a USB hub. When I removed the hub and used a direct USB connection instead, operation was then 100% reliable. I tried both powered &amp; non powered hubs &amp; the problem was reproduced immediately in both cases.

So - worth a try if you still have the problems and are working through a hub.

- J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scanning Problems Through a USB Hub</p>
<p>The following may help if you are still be having problems with scanner operation despite using scanbuttond.</p>
<p>My scanner would work about 1 time in 10, apparently depending on which USB device port it was allocated when it was plugged in. I normally connect it through a USB hub. When I removed the hub and used a direct USB connection instead, operation was then 100% reliable. I tried both powered &amp; non powered hubs &amp; the problem was reproduced immediately in both cases.</p>
<p>So - worth a try if you still have the problems and are working through a hub.</p>
<p>- J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Morningwood</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Morningwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1742</guid>
		<description>John,

People like you are the reason I switched to Ubuntu. It took some work to find someone whose tut made sense.

Your tut worked flawlessly. Thanks a bunch John and Ubuntu Geek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>People like you are the reason I switched to Ubuntu. It took some work to find someone whose tut made sense.</p>
<p>Your tut worked flawlessly. Thanks a bunch John and Ubuntu Geek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Craick</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1741</link>
		<dc:creator>John Craick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1741</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad this seems to have helped a few people.

A few things about this tip, esp. a correction to the original text ...

Line &quot;4. Test Basic scanner operation ... &quot; is wrong. It should say &quot;scanimage -T -d &quot;yourdevice&quot;
where &quot;yourdevice&quot; is something like plustek:libusb:005:008 (or whatever). I think that when originally entering the text I used the gt. &amp; lt. signs () and the message board software tossed them out as bad html. Sorry about that. I guess most folk will have figured that out, but if you just use &quot;scanimage -T -d&quot; on the command line, then nothing happens or maybe you get an error message.

Auto running scanbuttond at boot time : Arthus, and others privately, asked how the scanbuttond command could be issued automatically at boot up rather than being entered manually every time at the console. The short answer is yes, you can put it in a boot-up script but, this being Linux, it isn&#039;t as easy as just tossing the statement into our trusty  autoexec.bat file. I think an explanation is too long to put here but I&#039;ll do a separate tip on it shortly. Meanwhile, if you want to pursue this immediately, have a look at http://kudos.berlios.de/kf/kf1.html#zzboot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad this seems to have helped a few people.</p>
<p>A few things about this tip, esp. a correction to the original text &#8230;</p>
<p>Line &#8220;4. Test Basic scanner operation &#8230; &#8221; is wrong. It should say &#8220;scanimage -T -d &#8220;yourdevice&#8221;<br />
where &#8220;yourdevice&#8221; is something like plustek:libusb:005:008 (or whatever). I think that when originally entering the text I used the gt. &amp; lt. signs () and the message board software tossed them out as bad html. Sorry about that. I guess most folk will have figured that out, but if you just use &#8220;scanimage -T -d&#8221; on the command line, then nothing happens or maybe you get an error message.</p>
<p>Auto running scanbuttond at boot time : Arthus, and others privately, asked how the scanbuttond command could be issued automatically at boot up rather than being entered manually every time at the console. The short answer is yes, you can put it in a boot-up script but, this being Linux, it isn&#8217;t as easy as just tossing the statement into our trusty  autoexec.bat file. I think an explanation is too long to put here but I&#8217;ll do a separate tip on it shortly. Meanwhile, if you want to pursue this immediately, have a look at <a href="http://kudos.berlios.de/kf/kf1.html#zzboot" rel="nofollow">http://kudos.berlios.de/kf/kf1.html#zzboot</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthus</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>The Scanner CanonLide25 works fine after scanbuttond &quot;-r 1000000&quot; from the console. But i have one question, how can i make this &quot;scanbuttond -r 1000000&quot; runnimg after the Computer is started automatic ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Scanner CanonLide25 works fine after scanbuttond &#8220;-r 1000000&#8243; from the console. But i have one question, how can i make this &#8220;scanbuttond -r 1000000&#8243; runnimg after the Computer is started automatic ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html/comment-page-1#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fixing-a-scanner-broken-by-the-feisty-upgrade.html#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>Thanks,
My setup didnt like the -d option on
4. Test basic scanner operation : scanimage -T -d
so I left out &#039;-d&#039; and everything now works OK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks,<br />
My setup didnt like the -d option on<br />
4. Test basic scanner operation : scanimage -T -d<br />
so I left out &#8216;-d&#8217; and everything now works OK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

