<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Package Management from Command line using apt (Advanced Packaging Tool)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html</link>
	<description>Ubuntu Linux Tutorials,Howtos,Tips &#38; News &#124; Oneiric,Natty,Maverick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:40:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek Šabo</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-90995</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek Šabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 10:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-90995</guid>
		<description>Nice one. Just one thing, as Hmpf said apt-get dist-upgrade is higher level of upgrade, not release upgrade. Upgrade to new release e.g. in Ubuntu systems is done via do-release-upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one. Just one thing, as Hmpf said apt-get dist-upgrade is higher level of upgrade, not release upgrade. Upgrade to new release e.g. in Ubuntu systems is done via do-release-upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Limo</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-44792</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Limo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-44792</guid>
		<description>How to add some more apt-get sources ?? nvidia ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to add some more apt-get sources ?? nvidia ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Logan</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-39912</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 03:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-39912</guid>
		<description>What the heck does apt-get moo do? I looked at the man page but I still don&#039;t get it and there&#039;s no way I&#039;m gonna just punch that in without a clear idea of the result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck does apt-get moo do? I looked at the man page but I still don&#8217;t get it and there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m gonna just punch that in without a clear idea of the result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardy stevenson</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-9340</link>
		<dc:creator>hardy stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 22:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-9340</guid>
		<description>I cant believe you left out the most important
     and by far the most useful command   
            sudo apt-get moo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe you left out the most important<br />
     and by far the most useful command<br />
            sudo apt-get moo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vortex</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-6861</link>
		<dc:creator>Vortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-6861</guid>
		<description>instead of &quot;apt-get --purge remove&quot; you can simply use &quot;apt-get purge&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>instead of &#8220;apt-get --purge remove&#8221; you can simply use &#8220;apt-get purge&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmpf</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-6823</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-6823</guid>
		<description>Hm, as far as I remember &#039;apt-get dist-upgrade&#039; and not &#039;apt-get upgrade&#039; is the recommended way to upgrade packages. The reason is that a simple &#039;apt-get upgrade&#039; will not update a package if it depends on packages not already installed on the system. &#039;apt-get dist-upgrade&#039; will update the package and retrieve and install the needed dependencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, as far as I remember &#8216;apt-get dist-upgrade&#8217; and not &#8216;apt-get upgrade&#8217; is the recommended way to upgrade packages. The reason is that a simple &#8216;apt-get upgrade&#8217; will not update a package if it depends on packages not already installed on the system. &#8216;apt-get dist-upgrade&#8217; will update the package and retrieve and install the needed dependencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-6727</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-6727</guid>
		<description>It should be noted that apt-file is not in the default install and it has to be installed prior to usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be noted that apt-file is not in the default install and it has to be installed prior to usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-6724</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-6724</guid>
		<description>Use aptitude if you have it available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use aptitude if you have it available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gotunandan</title>
		<link>http://www.ubuntugeek.com/ubuntu-package-management-from-command-line-using-apt-advanced-packaging-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-6722</link>
		<dc:creator>gotunandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/?p=1062#comment-6722</guid>
		<description>Very good article.
One thing I wanted to point out was that you do not need to use &#039;sudo&#039; for apt-cache

$ apt-cache show build-essential

will work as a normal user as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article.<br />
One thing I wanted to point out was that you do not need to use &#8216;sudo&#8217; for apt-cache</p>
<p>$ apt-cache show build-essential</p>
<p>will work as a normal user as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

